In terms of behavioral treatment goals, how does FS differ from SM?

The correct answer highlights an important distinction between fluency shaping (FS) and stuttering modification (SM) approaches in speech therapy. Stuttering modification focuses on helping individuals manage their stuttering and may incorporate strategies for achieving spontaneous fluency or what is considered acceptable stuttering. This means that in therapy, the primary goal is not necessarily for the individual to speak without stuttering at all, but rather to approach stuttering in a more flexible and accepting manner. Clients are encouraged to communicate effectively, even if that involves some degree of stuttering, which allows for more natural speech patterns and reduces anxiety associated with speaking.

This approach contrasts with fluency shaping, which is primarily concerned with achieving smoother, more controlled speech. Fluency shaping techniques are often geared towards minimizing or eliminating stuttering to achieve a level of fluency that can be strictly monitored and measured. Therefore, the two methods have different objectives regarding how fluency is conceptualized and pursued in therapy, with stuttering modification valuing spontaneous and acceptable speech over absolute fluency.

Other options touch on aspects that are not fundamentally accurate or do not correspond with the primary intentions of both therapy modalities, making them less appropriate choices for distinguishing between FS and SM in the context of treatment goals.